But if the coder is not careful, Qt does leave dangling pointers. QT is good about deleting widgets sand freeing the heap memory when when the dialog box is deleted (not quite garbage collection, but it is close). Technical explanation for anyone who is interested: When a dialog box is created in Qt, it is much easier to create all the widgets using the memory heap (widgets created in the memory stack self-delete once the function is exited, even if the dialog box still exists). I have gone through the source code and done a massive search-replace for any potential memory leaks. But it is an important update as QT can leave some memory leaks if the dialog boxes are assembled in a certain manner. I will be putting out an update in a couple more days once I work out a couple more minor issues. I believe the crash issue related to forest terrain is fixed for good. Import .It's good to hear things are getting better. I found that you can either do the suite.xml mods, or do it "programmatically", but it's not necessary to do both.įor doing it programmatically, the method did not work me, but subclassing PowerMockTestCase did. I just successfully migrated a JUnit test case to TestNG, after initially encountering some issues. ![]() Since this page is highly ranked in search results, I just wanted to add a few more things to the helpful documentation Stephen already wrote about. Exactly your scenario of verifying calls to mocked static methods is described there using this example code: class MyTestClass void demoStaticMethodMocking() throws Exception Read through this link from the PowerMock GitHub site which describes further detail on how to use TestNG together with PowerMock. OK, I think this is very specific to TestNG configurations, since all of the JUnit examples work 'out of the box'! Also, it indicates the total number of tests as 3 whereas in this case I have only two test methods.ĮDIT : As suggested, I tried putting MyUtil class in the the annotation, it still gives the same error. It fails at the verifyStatic() method, which makes me think that the verifyStatic() method needs something more that i am not providing. Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1 Mocking methods declared on non-public parent classes is not supported.Īt (MyTest.java:10) Those methods *cannot* be stubbed/verified. ![]() > at (MyTest.java:21)Īlso, this error might show up because you verify either of: final/private/equals()/hashCode() methods. Missing method call for verify(mock) here: But when i run the test, it always passes, no matter what value i pass to PowerMockito.verifyStatic().Īlso, if I write another test method in this class and then run the test, I get the following error .UnfinishedVerificationException: This test is expected to fail, as myMethod calls the static method Util.myStaticMethod() only once. Private MyService ArgumentCaptor void setup() My Test class is shown below: public class MyTest Since verification of static methods is not natively supported in Mockito, I am using PowerMock along with it. I want to verify whether the myMethod() method in MyService class internally calls the static method Util.myStaticMethod with the correct arguments. I am using TestNG 6.9.6 with Mockito 1.10.19 and PowerMock 1.6.4. ![]() I am new TestNG and unit-testing in general.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |